The District’s groundbreaking paid family and medical leave has helped thousands of people take time away from work to heal and care for themselves and their families. Despite its tremendous impact and the fact that it has a dedicated funding source, the Mayor has proposed devastating cuts to the program. This is part of the Mayor’s overall proposal that balances the budget on the backs of workers and residents with the least resources.
DC’s Paid Leave Program Supports Workers and Businesses
DC’s Universal Paid Leave program (“PFL”) provides DC workers with wage replacement for up to 12 weeks when they go on leave to care for themselves or their family. People are allowed to use the program if they need to take time off because of their own medical need, the medical need of a family member, or to bond with a new child. The program also provides for 2 weeks of prenatal care for birthing parents.
The program is funded by a payroll tax, paid by every DC employer. While the payroll tax is set at 0.75% only 0.23% of this tax goes to the Paid Leave program and the rest gets swept into the general fund for the Mayor to allocate however she wants. For the upcoming budget year (fiscal year 2027), the Chief Financial Officer certified that putting 0.25% from the payroll tax toward PFL would maintain the program at current levels.
Paid leave supports businesses by boosting employee productivity, enhancing employee recruitment, and decreasing turnover costs. Without PFL, small businesses would be at a disadvantage in the hiring process, because they cannot offer the same paid leave benefits as larger, better resourced businesses. State paid leave programs increase mothers’ labor force participation by 6 percentage points in the year their child is born. Women who had paid leave access when their child was born are more likely to be in the labor force up to 5 years following the birth of their child. Paid leave not only benefits individual workers and their households by providing replacement wages during leave, it also increases overall employment and economic growth through increased spending by households receiving benefits.
The Mayor’s Proposed Changes Would Slash Benefits DC Workers Count On
In her fiscal year (FY) 2027 budget proposal, Mayor Bowser proposed several changes to PFL that would gut this critical benefit for DC workers:
Eliminates medical and family caregiving leave benefits for FY 2027. Between October 1, 2026 and September 30, 2027, workers would not be able to take leave for their own or family member’s serious medical needs. This means that if you or a loved one have a medical issue next year that prevents you from working, you would not be able to use this program.
Permanently caps the maximum weekly benefit at $1000. Currently, the max is $1,190, and it increases each year with inflation. Keeping the maximum at $1,000 would effectively decrease the value of the benefit over time.
Permanently reduces benefit length to 8 weeks (for medical leave) or 6 weeks (for family caregiving leave). Even after medical and family caregiving leave benefits resume in 2028, they would be cut from the current maximum of 12 weeks.
In making these cuts, the Mayor is raiding the payroll tax that employers contribute to so they can cover paid leave for their workers. Out of the 0.75% payroll tax, only a 0.11% rate would go toward paid leave for FY 2027.
Family Medical: Reduced to 6 weeks, Maximum $ reduced to $1000*, No new claims for 1 year
Personal Medical: Reduced to 8 weeks, Maximum $ reduced to $1000*, No new claims for 1 year
Parental Bonding: Reduced to $1000*
Prenatal: Reduced to $1000*
* no longer increases with inflation
Talking Points for Testimony
The Paid Leave program already has dedicated revenue via the payroll tax and is fully solvent. The mayor raiding this fund to make up for general revenue shortfalls, then saying that she is “right-sizing” the program, is dishonest.
Employers are paying the same amount of tax (0.75%) and getting less of a benefit for their employees. Since the Paid Leave program has already existed for years, many employers have built this leave into their benefits packages or collective bargaining agreements. In the coming year, employers will be forced to cut benefits or absorb the cost of up to $1190 per week of family and medical leave taken to maintain level benefits. This at the same time that they continue to pay at the same tax rate. Under the current proposal, less than 15% of the paid leave taxes paid by employers will actually go to fund the paid leave program.
People aren’t going to stop having medical problems over the next year. Instead, workers—many of whom already are one paycheck away from missing rent or other bills—will not have this critical lifeline when they are unable to work due to long-term illness or injury. And they may not be able to afford to take time off work to provide needed care for a loved one.
Permanently capping the maximum benefit at $1000/week immediately cuts the benefits by nearly 20% and forever institutionalizes gradual cuts to the value of this benefit as the cost of living increases over time.
Medical providers should decide the length of time people need to use the program, not the Mayor. The Mayor has frequently cited that average medical leave use is 8 weeks, so it’s maximally effective to cut the program off there. But the average is made up of people who need less than and more than 8 weeks. Therefore these cuts would exclude those with more severe medical needs and deserve to use the program to its fullest—even if there are fewer people in this category.
DC has chosen to invest in universal paid leave in part to level the playing field for small businesses to compete for and retain the employees who will make their business thrive. If the District cuts paid leave benefits, larger employers are much more likely to be able to make up for the lost benefits out of pocket to give themselves a leg up in recruiting and retaining employees, putting small businesses at a disadvantage. In these difficult times, D.C.’s small businesses need support, not cuts to the programs they count on to help their businesses thrive and compete.
Cutting medical leave benefits harms health equity. Under this proposal, for next year, only those whose employers provide paid medical leave or those who can afford to take leave unpaid will be able to take the full time they need to heal or get treatment. That means that many workers, especially low-income workers and workers of color—who are less likely to have access to paid leave or be able to take unpaid leave—will go back to work before they are ready, take less time than they need, or even forego or postpone needed care, harming their health.
These effects also compound existing racial and wealth health disparities. For example, research shows that Black patients are diagnosed or treated later than white patients for many cancers and other serious diseases. Later diagnosis or treatment can mean needing longer to recover—making longer paid leave all the more important.
Furthermore due to the District’s Paid Leave program operating for 8 years many DC businesses no longer have a private paid leave program as they operate on the understanding their employees will be able to utilize the District’s program, which they pay into.
Sources: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14acoF4Q5Od3cad5VGkz1sV2rwmCCsaRa1p3Xw4e7ENQ/edit?usp=sharing








